Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/11774
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Saket, Palak | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-09T14:08:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-09T14:08:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gupta, S., Patro, A., Mittal, Y., Dwivedi, S., Saket, P., Panja, R., . . . Yadav, A. K. (2023). The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level. Science of the Total Environment, 879 doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-9697 | - |
dc.identifier.other | EID(2-s2.0-85151312330) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/11774 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the journey of continuously progressing MFC technology from the lab to the field so far. It evaluates the historical development of MFC, and the emergence of different variants of MFC or MFC-associated other technologies such as sediment-microbial fuel cell (S-MFC), plant-microbial fuel cell (P-MFC), and integrated constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cell (CW-MFC). This review has assessed primary applications and challenges to overcome existing limitations for commercialization of these technologies. In addition, it further illustrates the design and potential applications of S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC. Lastly, the maturity and readiness of MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC for real-world implementation were assessed by multicriteria-based assessment. Wastewater treatment efficiency, bioelectricity generation efficiency, energy demand, cost investment, and scale-up potential were mainly considered as key criteria. Other sustainability criteria, such as life cycle and environmental impact assessments were also evaluated. © 2023 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | en_US |
dc.source | Science of the Total Environment | en_US |
dc.subject | Bio-electrochemical systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Bioelectricity generation | en_US |
dc.subject | Constructed wetland integrated microbial fuel cell | en_US |
dc.subject | Electroactive wetlands | en_US |
dc.subject | Plant microbial fuel cell | en_US |
dc.subject | Sediment microbial fuel cell | en_US |
dc.subject | Wastewater treatment | en_US |
dc.title | The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level | en_US |
dc.type | Review | en_US |
dc.rights.license | All Open Access, Hybrid Gold | - |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Altmetric Badge: