Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/12409
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHajra, Rajkumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T12:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-03T12:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationTsurutani, B. T., Lakhina, G. S., & Hajra, R. (2023). Comments on “New Insights From the 2003 Halloween Storm Into the Colaba 1600 nT Magnetic Depression During the 1859 Carrington Storm” by S. Ohtani (2022). Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031034en_US
dc.identifier.issn2169-9380-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85163359401)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031034-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/12409-
dc.description.abstractThe Colaba, India ∼−1,600 nT magnetic spike caused by an interplanetary sheath magnetic field inducing a “dayside R1-field aligned current wedge” during the Carrington magnetic storm proposed by Ohtani (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596 seems highly improbable. Normal interplanetary magnetic field intensities of ∼5 nT have previously been shown to be sufficient to explain the ∼+120 nT sudden impulse (SI+) observed at Colaba during the storm (Tsurutani et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779). Magnetohydrodynamic theory (Kennel et al., 1985, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM034p0001) predicts a maximum of 4× magnetic field compression by a fast shock, giving an interplanetary sheath field of ∼20 nT, a value too low to support the Ohtani (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596 hypothesis. The Ohtani (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596 (and G. Siscoe et al., 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102) claim of a further 10× amplification of the interplanetary sheath fields has not been verified in near-Earth interplanetary sheaths. The original (Tsurutani et al., 2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009504) hypothesis that an interplanetary coronal mass ejection magnetic cloud (MC) having southward magnetic fields of ∼90 nT caused the Carrington magnetic storm main phase of peak SYM-H/Dst = −1,760 nT seems more likely. The short time between the SI+ and the storm main phase onset implies a foreshortened interplanetary sheath. The extremely rapid recovery of the magnetic storm was hypothesized by Tsurutani et al. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779 as being due to nonlinear ring current losses. We point out that the Hydro-Quebec 1989 storm was caused by multiple shock-sheaths and MCs (Lakhina &ampen_US
dc.description.abstractTsurutani, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0037-4) unlike the interplanetary causes of the Carrington storm. The Hydro-Quebec event was a “stealth” magnetic storm. © 2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Incen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsen_US
dc.subjectCarrington stormen_US
dc.subjectCarrington storm intensityen_US
dc.subjectColaba magnetic depressionen_US
dc.subjectHalloween stormen_US
dc.subjectHydro-Quebec stormen_US
dc.subjectstealth magnetic stormen_US
dc.titleComments on “New Insights From the 2003 Halloween Storm Into the Colaba 1600 nT Magnetic Depression During the 1859 Carrington Storm” by S. Ohtani (2022)en_US
dc.typeNoteen_US
dc.rights.licenseAll Open Access, Green-
Appears in Collections:Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: