Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/12944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Rahul Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Dibyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMisra, Shilpien_US
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Amrendra Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T09:18:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-22T09:18:59Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationGuragain, M., Pinjari, D., Misra, R., & D’Souza, F. (2023). Zinc Tetrapyrrole Coordinated to Imidazole Functionalized Tetracyanobutadiene or Cyclohexa-2,5-diene-1,4-diylidene-expanded-tetracyanobutadiene Conjugates: Dark vs. Light-Induced Electron Transfer. Chemistry - A European Journal. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202302665en_US
dc.identifier.issn1477-9226-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85174493780)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/d3dt03149g-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/12944-
dc.description.abstractAn unexpected reversal in catalytic activity for acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling compared to acceptorless alcohol dehydrogenation has been observed using a series of cationic Ru(ii)-CNC pincer complexes with different ancillary ligands. In continuation of our study of cationic Ru(ii)-CNC pincer complexes 1a-6a, new complexes with bulky N-wingtips [Ru(CNCiPr)(CO)(PPh3)Br]PF6 (1b), [Ru(CNCCy)(CO)(PPh3)Cl]PF6 (1c), [Ru(CNCCy)(CO)(PPh3)H]PF6 (2c), [Ru(CNCiPr)(PPh3)2Cl]PF6 (3b), [Ru(CNCCy)(PPh3)2Cl]PF6 (3c), [Ru(CNCiPr)(PPh3)2H]PF6 (4b), [Ru(CNCCy)(PPh3)2H]PF6 (4c), [Ru(CNCiPr)(DMSO)2Cl]PF6 (6b), and [Ru(CNCCy)(DMSO)2Cl]PF6 (6c) [CNCR = 2,6-bis(1-alkylimidazol-2-ylidene)-pyridine] have been synthesized and the catalytic activities of the new complexes have been compared with their N-methyl analogues for transfer hydrogenation of cyclohexanone and acceptorless dehydrogenation of benzyl alcohol. Furthermore, all complexes have been utilized as catalysts in the dehydrogenative coupling reaction of benzyl alcohol with amines. While the catalytic activities of the new complexes for transfer hydrogenation and acceptorless alcohol dehydrogenation were found to be in line with the previously observed trend based on the ancillary ligands (CO &gten_US
dc.description.abstractCOD &gten_US
dc.description.abstractDMSO &gten_US
dc.description.abstractPPh3), for the acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling reaction, complexes containing PPh3 and DMSO ligands performed better compared to complexes containing CO and COD ligands. Based on NMR and mass investigation of catalytic reactions, a plausible mechanism has been suggested to explain the difference in catalytic activity and its reversal during the dehydrogenative coupling reaction. Furthermore, the substrate scope for the dehydrogenative coupling reaction of benzyl alcohol with a wide range of amines has been explored, including synthesizing some pharmaceutically important imines. All new complexes have been characterized by various spectroscopic techniques, and the structures of 4b and 6b have been confirmed by the single-crystal X-ray diffraction technique. © 2023 The Royal Society of Chemistry.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.sourceDalton Transactionsen_US
dc.titleRole of ancillary ligands in selectivity towards acceptorless dehydrogenation versus dehydrogenative coupling of alcohols and amines catalyzed by cationic ruthenium(ii)-CNC pincer complexesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: