Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/14799
Title: Masked Autoencoders for Spatial-Temporal Relationship in Video-Based Group Activity Recognition
Authors: Banda, Gourinath
Keywords: Group activity recognition (GAR);hostage crime;IITP hostage dataset;masked autoencoder;spatial and temporal interaction;vision transformer
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Citation: Yadav, R., Halder, R., & Banda, G. (2024). Masked Autoencoders for Spatial-Temporal Relationship in Video-Based Group Activity Recognition. IEEE Access. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3457024
Abstract: Group Activity Recognition (GAR) is a challenging problem involving several intricacies. The core of GAR lies in delving into spatiotemporal features to generate appropriate scene representations. Previous methods, however, either feature a complex framework requiring individual action labels or need more adequate modelling of spatial and temporal features. To address these concerns, we propose a masking strategy for learning task-specific GAR scene representations through reconstruction. Furthermore, we elucidate how this methodology can effectively capture task-specific spatiotemporal features. In particular, three notable findings emerge from our framework: 1) GAR is simplified, eliminating the need for individual action labels
2) the generation of target-specific spatiotemporal features yields favourable outcomes for various datasets
and 3) this method demonstrates effectiveness even for datasets with a small number of videos, highlighting its capability with limited training data. Further, the existing GAR datasets have fewer videos per class and only a few actors are considered, restricting the existing model from being generalised effectively. To this aim, we introduce 923 videos for a crime activity named IITP Hostage, which contains two categories, hostage and non-hostage. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to recognize crime-based activities in GAR. Our framework achieves MCA of 96.8%, 97.0%, 97.0% on Collective Activity Dataset (CAD), new CAD, extended CAD datasets and 84.3%, 95.6%, 96.78% for IITP Hostage, hostage+CAD and subset of UCF crime datasets. The hostage and non-hostage scenarios introduce additional complexity, making it more challenging for the model to accurately recognize the activities compared to hostage+CAD and other datasets. This observation underscores the necessity to delve deeper into the complexity of GAR activities. © 2013 IEEE.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3457024
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/14799
ISSN: 2169-3536
Type of Material: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: