Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/17650
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrawar, Bhuvneshen_US
dc.contributor.authorDatta, Abhirupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-09T13:21:15Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-09T13:21:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationBhattacharjee, S., Shrivastava, M. N., Pandey, U. S., Brawar, B., Nanda, K., Panda, S. K., Potirakis, S. M., Sasmal, S., Datta, A., & Maurya, A. K. (2025). Contrasting Low-Latitude Ionospheric Total Electron Content Responses to the 7–8 and 10–11 October 2024 Geomagnetic Storms. Atmosphere, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16121364en_US
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-105026029863)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos16121364-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/17650-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the ionospheric responses to two successive geomagnetic storms that occurred on 7–8 and 10–11 October 2024 over the Indian equatorial and low-latitude sector. Using GNSS-derived vertical total electron content (VTEC) measurements and the Global Ionosphere Map (GIM)-derived VTEC variation, supported by O/N<inf>2</inf> ratio variations, equatorial electrojet (EEJ) estimates, and modeled equatorial electric fields from the Prompt Penetration Equatorial Electric Field Model (PPEEFM), the distinct mechanisms driving storm-time ionospheric variability were identified. The 7–8 October storm produced a strong positive phase in the morning sector, with VTEC enhancements exceeding 100 TECU, followed by sharp afternoon depletions. This short-lived response was dominated by prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs), subsequently suppressed by disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs) and storm-induced compositional changes. In contrast, the 10–11 October storm generated a more complex and prolonged response, including sustained nighttime enhancements, suppression of early morning peaks, and strong afternoon depletions persisting into the recovery phase. This behavior was mainly controlled by DDEFs and significant reductions in O/N<inf>2</inf>, consistent with long-lasting negative storm effects. EEJ variability further confirmed the interplay of PPEF and DDEF drivers during both events. The results highlight that even storms of comparable intensity can produce fundamentally different ionospheric outcomes depending on the dominance of electrodynamic versus thermospheric processes. These findings provide new insights into storm-time ionospheric variability over the Indian sector and are crucial for improving space weather prediction and GNSS-based applications in low-latitude regions. © 2025 by the authors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.sourceAtmosphereen_US
dc.subjectgeomagnetic stormen_US
dc.subjectGNSS total electron contenten_US
dc.subjectionosphereen_US
dc.subjectsolar cycle 25en_US
dc.subjectspace weatheren_US
dc.subjectwave propagationen_US
dc.titleContrasting Low-Latitude Ionospheric Total Electron Content Responses to the 7–8 and 10–11 October 2024 Geomagnetic Stormsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: