Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/4611
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Puneet | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T15:34:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T15:34:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gupta, P., & Rahtu, E. (2019). MLAttack: Fooling semantic segmentation networks by multi-layer attacks doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9783030336752 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0302-9743 | - |
dc.identifier.other | EID(2-s2.0-85076181547) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_28 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/4611 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Despite the immense success of deep neural networks, their applicability is limited because they can be fooled by adversarial examples, which are generated by adding visually imperceptible and structured perturbations to the original image. Semantic segmentation is required in several visual recognition tasks, but unlike image classification, only a few studies are available for attacking semantic segmentation networks. The existing semantic segmentation adversarial attacks employ different gradient based loss functions which are defined using only the last layer of the network for gradient backpropogation. But some components of semantic segmentation networks implicitly mitigate several adversarial attacks (like multiscale analysis) due to which the existing attacks perform poorly. This provides us the motivation to introduce a new attack in this paper known as MLAttack, i.e., Multiple Layers Attack. It carefully selects several layers and use them to define a loss function for gradient based adversarial attack on semantic segmentation architectures. Experiments conducted on publicly available dataset using the state-of-the-art segmentation network architectures, demonstrate that MLAttack performs better than existing state-of-the-art semantic segmentation attacks. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.source | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) | en_US |
dc.subject | Deep neural networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Image segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Network architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Pattern recognition | en_US |
dc.subject | Semantic Web | en_US |
dc.subject | Semantics | en_US |
dc.subject | Gradient based | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi scale analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Multiple layers | en_US |
dc.subject | Original images | en_US |
dc.subject | Semantic segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | State of the art | en_US |
dc.subject | Structured perturbations | en_US |
dc.subject | Visual recognition | en_US |
dc.subject | Network layers | en_US |
dc.title | MLAttack: Fooling Semantic Segmentation Networks by Multi-layer Attacks | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Computer Science and Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Altmetric Badge: