Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShah, Ambika Prasaden_US
dc.contributor.authorVishvakarma, Santosh Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T15:43:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T15:43:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationShah, A. P., Vishvakarma, S. K., & Cotofana, S. (2019). NBTI stress delay sensitivity analysis of reliability enhanced schmitt trigger based circuits. Microelectronics Reliability, 102 doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2019.06.083en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-2714-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85068971323)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2019.06.083-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5698-
dc.description.abstractNegative Bias Temperature Instability (NBTI) in PMOS transistors results in increased transistor threshold voltage, is considered the major contributor to circuit performance degradation and to alleviate its effect appropriate design and lifetime measures are required. In this paper, we concentrate on a design-time solution, i.e., the replacement of CMOS inverters by more reliable counterparts, i.e., Schmitt Trigger (ST) and NMOS only Schmitt Trigger with Voltage Booster (NST-VB). We first compare the three candidates implemented in 32 nm CMOS technology concerning delay variation. Our results indicate that, after three years of NBTI stress, NST-VB exhibits an almost negligible delay shift of 0.47%, while ST and CMOS inverter experience a delay shift of 7.2% and 5.32%, respectively. Subsequently, we extend the scope and assume the ISCAS'89 s27 circuit as a discussion vehicle. Our evaluations indicate that after 3-year stress time, the critical path delay of the s27 CMOS, ST, and NST-VB based implementations increases by 105.1 ps, 185.2 ps, and 94.2 ps, respectively. To put things into a better perspective, we introduce the Inverse Power Area Reliability Product (IPARP) as compound reliability metric. Our analysis indicates that the normalized IPARP values for ST and NST-VB implementations are 0.062 and 1.903, respectively, compared to CMOS implementation. © 2019 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceMicroelectronics Reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectCMOS integrated circuitsen_US
dc.subjectDelay circuitsen_US
dc.subjectField effect transistorsen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated circuit designen_US
dc.subjectNanostructured materialsen_US
dc.subjectNegative bias temperature instabilityen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectReliability analysisen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity analysisen_US
dc.subjectThermodynamic stabilityen_US
dc.subjectThreshold voltageen_US
dc.subjectTiming circuitsen_US
dc.subjectAppropriate designsen_US
dc.subjectBenchmark suitesen_US
dc.subjectCircuit performanceen_US
dc.subjectCritical path delaysen_US
dc.subjectDesign for reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectpMOS transistorsen_US
dc.subjectSchmitt triggeren_US
dc.subjectThreshold voltage degradationen_US
dc.subjectTrigger circuitsen_US
dc.titleNBTI stress delay sensitivity analysis of reliability enhanced Schmitt trigger based circuitsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Electrical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: