Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKranti, Abhinaven_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T15:44:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T15:44:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationDwivedi, P., & Kranti, A. (2018). Dielectric modulated biosensor architecture: Tunneling or accumulation based transistor? IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(8), 3228-3235. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2018.2808948en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-437X-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85042700773)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2808948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5851-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we present a feasibility assessment of tunneling and accumulation mode p-type transistor architectures for use as dielectric-modulated biosensors. The performance of devices is compared through the estimation of the change in electrical characteristics between Iris antigen (bioreceptor) and anti-Iris antigen (target biomolecule) for a partially filled cavity. While tunnel field-effect transistors (TFETs) achieve higher sensitivity when biomolecules are positioned at the source-channel junction, the sensitivity rapidly diminishes when biomolecules are located away from the tunneling junction and, thus, severely limits their utility. Although accumulation mode field-effect transistors (AMFETs) also exhibit location-dependent sensitivity degradation, they show higher sensitivity values in comparison to the TFET for biomolecule layer located away from the source-channel junction. Furthermore, the application of back bias (1 V) significantly improves the sensitivity (>8) for 40% filled cavity of p-type AMFET biosensors for all locations in the dielectric cavity. As higher sensitivity values over a wider biomolecule location are desirable, an AMFET performs better in comparison to the TFET cavity-modulated biosensor. This paper presents a systematic analysis, highlighting the benefits and limitations of each device for biosensing applications. Results highlight new viewpoints and insights in the design of AMFET-based cavity-modulated biosensors. © 2001-2012 IEEE.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.sourceIEEE Sensors Journalen_US
dc.subjectAntigensen_US
dc.subjectBiomoleculesen_US
dc.subjectBiosensorsen_US
dc.subjectCavity resonatorsen_US
dc.subjectElectron tunnelingen_US
dc.subjectLocationen_US
dc.subjectLogic gatesen_US
dc.subjectMOSFET devicesen_US
dc.subjectTransistorsen_US
dc.subjectTunnel field effect transistorsen_US
dc.subjectCurrent sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectMOS-FETen_US
dc.subjectSensitivityen_US
dc.subjectTFETsen_US
dc.subjectTunnel FETen_US
dc.subjectField effect transistorsen_US
dc.titleDielectric Modulated Biosensor Architecture: Tunneling or Accumulation Based Transistor?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Electrical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: