Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhatia, Vimalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T15:45:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T15:45:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationMitra, R., & Bhatia, V. (2017). Finite dictionary techniques for MSER equalization in RKHS. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 11(5), 849-856. doi:10.1007/s11760-016-1031-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1863-1703-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85000997370)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-016-1031-1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/5948-
dc.description.abstractAdaptive channel equalization is a signal processing technique to mitigate inter-symbol interference in a time dispersive channel. For adaptive equalization, minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion-based reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) approaches such as the kernel least mean squares (KLMS) algorithm and its variants have been suggested in the literature for nonlinear channels. Another optimality criterion, based on minimum bit/symbol error rate (MBER/MSER), is a better choice for adapting an equalizer as compared to MMSE criterion. A kernel-based minimum symbol error rate (KMSER) equalization algorithm combines minimum symbol error rate (MSER)-based approaches with RKHS techniques. However, most algorithms in RKHS such as KMSER/KLMS require infinite storage requirement and hence cannot be practically implemented. To curtail the infinite memory requirement, and make adaptive algorithm suitable for implementation with finite memory and processing power, we propose quantized KMSER (QKMSER) and fixed-budget quantized KMSER (FBQKMSER)-based equalizers in this paper. In this paper, we derive the dynamical equation for MSE evolution of the QKMSER and FBQKMSER and find their performance to be asymptotically close to the MSE behavior of the KMSER. Also, it is found via simulations that the tracking performance of FBQKMSER is better than all the compared algorithms in this paper which is particularly useful for non-stationary channels. © 2016, Springer-Verlag London.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Londonen_US
dc.sourceSignal, Image and Video Processingen_US
dc.subjectAdaptive algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectBit error rateen_US
dc.subjectBudget controlen_US
dc.subjectErrorsen_US
dc.subjectInterference suppressionen_US
dc.subjectMean square erroren_US
dc.subjectSignal encodingen_US
dc.subjectSignal processingen_US
dc.subjectFixed budgeten_US
dc.subjectKernel tricken_US
dc.subjectMinimum symbol error ratesen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear equalizationen_US
dc.subjectQuantized KMSERen_US
dc.subjectRKHSen_US
dc.subjectEqualizersen_US
dc.titleFinite dictionary techniques for MSER equalization in RKHSen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Electrical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: