Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Manish Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:45:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:45:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAbbasi, N. A., Hamrani, A., Madramootoo, C. A., Zhang, T., Tan, C. S., & Goyal, M. K. (2021). Modelling carbon dioxide emissions under a maize-soy rotation using machine learning. Biosystems Engineering, 212, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.09.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1537-5110-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85117194917)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.09.013-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6189-
dc.description.abstractClimatic parameters influence CO2 emissions and the complexity of the relationship is not fully captured in biophysical models. Machine learning (ML) is now being applied to environmental problems, and it is, therefore, opportune to investigate ML models in CO2 predictions from agricultural soils. In this study, six ML models were compared for their predictive performance by comparing field measurements of CO2 emissions from two fertiliser treatments: inorganic fertiliser (IF) and solid cattle manure supplemented with inorganic fertiliser (SCM) applied to a maize-soy rotation. The study also included a generalised scenario where all the data from IF and SCM were included in one dataset. The ML models include support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), feed-forward neural network (FNN), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and extreme learning machine (ELM). The input parameters were soil moisture, soil temperature, soil organic matter, soil total carbon, soil total nitrogen, air temperature, solar radiation and pan evaporation, while the output parameter was field measured CO2 emissions. The results of this study demonstrated that RF was the best at predicting CO2 emissions from IF [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.92 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.27], SCM (R2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 2.86) and generalised scenarios (R2 = 0.86 and RMSE = 3.05). We conclude that ML models provide an innovative, robust and time-efficient alternative to biophysical models. © 2021 IAgrEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.sourceBiosystems Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural robotsen_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectDecision treesen_US
dc.subjectFertilizersen_US
dc.subjectGlobal warmingen_US
dc.subjectLearning algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectMean square erroren_US
dc.subjectRadial basis function networksen_US
dc.subjectSoil moistureen_US
dc.subjectSupport vector machinesen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural soilsen_US
dc.subjectBiophysical modelen_US
dc.subjectClassic regressionen_US
dc.subjectCO 2 emissionen_US
dc.subjectInorganic fertilizersen_US
dc.subjectMachine learning algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectMachine learning modelsen_US
dc.subjectNeural-networksen_US
dc.subjectRoot mean square errorsen_US
dc.subjectShallow neural networken_US
dc.subjectCarbon dioxideen_US
dc.titleModelling carbon dioxide emissions under a maize-soy rotation using machine learningen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: