Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6189
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goyal, Manish Kumar | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-21T10:45:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-21T10:45:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abbasi, N. A., Hamrani, A., Madramootoo, C. A., Zhang, T., Tan, C. S., & Goyal, M. K. (2021). Modelling carbon dioxide emissions under a maize-soy rotation using machine learning. Biosystems Engineering, 212, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.09.013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1537-5110 | - |
dc.identifier.other | EID(2-s2.0-85117194917) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.09.013 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6189 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Climatic parameters influence CO2 emissions and the complexity of the relationship is not fully captured in biophysical models. Machine learning (ML) is now being applied to environmental problems, and it is, therefore, opportune to investigate ML models in CO2 predictions from agricultural soils. In this study, six ML models were compared for their predictive performance by comparing field measurements of CO2 emissions from two fertiliser treatments: inorganic fertiliser (IF) and solid cattle manure supplemented with inorganic fertiliser (SCM) applied to a maize-soy rotation. The study also included a generalised scenario where all the data from IF and SCM were included in one dataset. The ML models include support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), feed-forward neural network (FNN), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and extreme learning machine (ELM). The input parameters were soil moisture, soil temperature, soil organic matter, soil total carbon, soil total nitrogen, air temperature, solar radiation and pan evaporation, while the output parameter was field measured CO2 emissions. The results of this study demonstrated that RF was the best at predicting CO2 emissions from IF [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.92 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.27], SCM (R2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 2.86) and generalised scenarios (R2 = 0.86 and RMSE = 3.05). We conclude that ML models provide an innovative, robust and time-efficient alternative to biophysical models. © 2021 IAgrE | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Academic Press | en_US |
dc.source | Biosystems Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Agricultural robots | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision trees | en_US |
dc.subject | Fertilizers | en_US |
dc.subject | Global warming | en_US |
dc.subject | Learning algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | Mean square error | en_US |
dc.subject | Radial basis function networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil moisture | en_US |
dc.subject | Support vector machines | en_US |
dc.subject | Agricultural soils | en_US |
dc.subject | Biophysical model | en_US |
dc.subject | Classic regression | en_US |
dc.subject | CO 2 emission | en_US |
dc.subject | Inorganic fertilizers | en_US |
dc.subject | Machine learning algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | Machine learning models | en_US |
dc.subject | Neural-networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Root mean square errors | en_US |
dc.subject | Shallow neural network | en_US |
dc.subject | Carbon dioxide | en_US |
dc.title | Modelling carbon dioxide emissions under a maize-soy rotation using machine learning | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Civil Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Altmetric Badge: