Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6296
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Saikaten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:46:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:46:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationVenkatesh Varma, T., Sarkar, S., & Mondal, G. (2020). Buckling restrained sizing and shape optimization of truss structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 146(5) doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002590en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9445-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85081054783)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002590-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6296-
dc.description.abstractAn integrated strategy for sizing and shape optimization of truss structures, taking buckling constraints implicitly into truss design, is demonstrated here. Because the associated objective functional is not convex, a derivative-free directionality-based global optimization scheme is adopted. As required by the problem, the change of measure-based evolutionary optimization (COMBEO) optimization scheme is appropriately enhanced in this work to incorporate complex inequality constraints without affording any violation. The applied scheme arrests buckling through a forward model via capturing geometric nonlinear responses of the structure. For this purpose, each truss element is modeled using two corotational beam elements with moment releases at hinged ends. Local and global imperfections are introduced to induce buckling of a single member and global buckling of the structure, respectively. These imperfections are randomly generated using Gaussian distribution to arrive at a resilient structure. While past research used large numbers of buckling constraints explicitly to optimize truss weight, the proposed scheme eliminates the same by adding buckling implicitly in the forward model. Present formalism also includes capturing nonlinear responses of the structure to eliminate structural failure due to geometric nonlinearity. Robustness of the proposed scheme is demonstrated extensively using four different types of trusses. The proposed formalism can be used to solve many other structural optimization problems involving geometric nonlinearity and imperfections. © 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Structural Engineering (United States)en_US
dc.subjectBucklingen_US
dc.subjectConstraint theoryen_US
dc.subjectFracture mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectGeometryen_US
dc.subjectGlobal optimizationen_US
dc.subjectStructural designen_US
dc.subjectStructural optimizationen_US
dc.subjectTrussesen_US
dc.subjectBuckling constraintsen_US
dc.subjectDerivative-freeen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary optimizationsen_US
dc.subjectGeometric non-linearen_US
dc.subjectGeometric non-linearityen_US
dc.subjectInequality constrainten_US
dc.subjectStructural optimization problemsen_US
dc.subjectTruss optimizationen_US
dc.subjectShape optimizationen_US
dc.titleBuckling Restrained Sizing and Shape Optimization of Truss Structuresen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: