Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6458
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNajar, Sajad Ahmaden_US
dc.contributor.authorKhanganba, Sanjram Premjiten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:48:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:48:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationNajar, S. A., & Sanjram, P. K. (2018). Gaze behavior and human error in distracted driving: Unlocking the complexity of articulatory rehearsal mechanism. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 12-23. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.005en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-8478-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85052054869)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.005-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6458-
dc.description.abstractThis study reports development of an experimental paradigm named as ‘Direction Following in Distracted Driving - Suppression of Articulatory Rehearsal Mechanism (D3-SARM)’. It investigates the effect of suppressed articulatory rehearsal mechanism (ARM) on gaze behavior and driving performance in a naturalistic driving environment. Drivers (N = 45) voluntarily participated in the study and drove an instrumented vehicle on a two-lane track. They were required to follow certain directions displayed on the direction signboards that were installed along the track. There were three levels of suppression of ARM namely, non-suppression (NS), simple suppression (SS), and complex suppression (CS). Equal number of participants were randomly assigned to each level of suppression. The results demonstrate that there are significantly lesser fixation durations and fixation counts under CS of ARM as compared to the other two levels. Overall driving error analysis revealed that there are more significant errors under CS as compared to SS and NS. Moreover, drivers committed more slips than lapses irrespective of the levels of suppression. On the whole, this study suggests that suppression of ARM affects gaze behavior and compromises driving performance. Also, even in the case of drivers being unable to have fixation on target visual information irrespective of non-suppressed ARM or suppressed ARM, drivers paid visits. © 2018 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviouren_US
dc.subjectAutomobile driversen_US
dc.subjectError analysisen_US
dc.subjectArticulatory rehearsal mechanism (ARM)en_US
dc.subjectDistracted drivingen_US
dc.subjectDriving environmenten_US
dc.subjectDriving errorsen_US
dc.subjectDriving performanceen_US
dc.subjectGaze behavioren_US
dc.subjectInstrumented vehicleen_US
dc.subjectVisual informationen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral researchen_US
dc.titleGaze behavior and human error in distracted driving: Unlocking the complexity of articulatory rehearsal mechanismen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Humanities and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: