Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6564
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Bapanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:49:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:49:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBarman, B., & Ghosh, B. (2021). Role of time delay and harvesting in some predator–prey communities with different functional responses and intra-species competition. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, doi:10.1080/02286203.2021.1983747en_US
dc.identifier.issn0228-6203-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85118434163)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2021.1983747-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6564-
dc.description.abstractWe propose four predator–prey models: RM (Rosenzweig–MacArthur) model, BD model (RM type model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response), RMI model (i.e., RM model with intraspecific competition among predators) and BDI model (BD model with intraspecific competition among predators). Each model incorporates time delay in the predators’ numerical response. We first analyse the delay-induced stability for all the models. We show that increasing delay always destabilizes a coexisting stable equilibrium in RM and BD models. However, increasing delay does not always destabilize a stable equilibrium in RMI and BDI models. Indeed, the stable equilibrium, in the latter two models, may also maintain its stability due to varying delay. Thus, one of the major conclusions is that the invariance property of the local stability in RMI and BDI models is due to the influence of intraspecific competition. Analytically, we prove that stability switching is impossible to occur in all the models. Later, we implement harvesting of the prey and predator separately, which may generate stability switching. If populations oscillate in the unharvested system, extensive effort has a potential to stabilize the equilibrium. Under the same natural condition (unharvested situation), prey harvesting and predator harvesting may produce opposite dynamic modes. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Modelling and Simulationen_US
dc.subjectDifferential equationsen_US
dc.subjectPredator prey systemsen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectTime delayen_US
dc.subjectTiming circuitsen_US
dc.subjectBDI modelen_US
dc.subjectBeddington-De Angelis functional responseen_US
dc.subjectDelay differential equationsen_US
dc.subjectFunctional responseen_US
dc.subjectHopfbifurcationen_US
dc.subjectIntra-species competitionen_US
dc.subjectIntraspecific competitionen_US
dc.subjectPredator-Preyen_US
dc.subjectStability switchingen_US
dc.subjectStable equilibriumen_US
dc.subjectHarvestingen_US
dc.titleRole of time delay and harvesting in some predator–prey communities with different functional responses and intra-species competitionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mathematics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: