Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7555
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTiwari, Saurabhen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:12:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:12:01Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationTiwari, S., Das, S., & Ch, V. A. N. (2019). Mechanical properties of al-si-SiC composites. Materials Research Express, 6(7) doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab1521en_US
dc.identifier.issn2053-1591-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85066068716)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1521-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7555-
dc.description.abstractThis paper dealt with cyclic stress properties of Al-Si (LM13) alloy and 10 wt% SiC particle reinforced composite in the cast and T6 temper conditions at ambient temperature. Fully inverse loading was applied to the materials with stress amplitude maximum up to 50 000 cycles. Stress versus No of cycle curve was generated. Fatigue strength of artificially aged LM13 alloy was found more than the cast alloy; however, dispersion of SiC particles deteriorated the fatigue life under the present domain of experiments. The mechanical properties such as ultimate tensile strength, offset yield strength and % elongation were found inferior for composites compared to the base alloy. Remarkable improvement in mechanical properties was observed in heat-treated alloy and composites. Scanning Electron Microscopic examinations of fatigue fractured surfaces of LM13 alloy depicted interface decohesion, was the predominant mechanism for failure in T6 tempered alloy, whereas fracturing of eutectic silicon was predominant in cast alloy. In (Al-Si)-SiC composites, cracks were initiated due to decohesion of the particle-matrix interface and in some instances breaking of the SiC particles. It was observed that heat treated eutectic silicon, which was near-spherical in shape, resisted fatigue crack growth because of better cohesive force with the Aluminium matrix as compared to SiC particle and fewer sites for stress riser. Better bonding between eutectic silicon and Aluminium matrix caused the crack to pass through the interface whereas Si particle endures fatigue load and ultimately, crack surpassed particle by fracturing it. © 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishingen_US
dc.sourceMaterials Research Expressen_US
dc.subjectAluminum alloysen_US
dc.subjectCracksen_US
dc.subjectEutecticsen_US
dc.subjectFatigue crack propagationen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectInverse problemsen_US
dc.subjectMatrix algebraen_US
dc.subjectMechanical propertiesen_US
dc.subjectParticle reinforced compositesen_US
dc.subjectSilicon alloysen_US
dc.subjectSilicon carbideen_US
dc.subjectStress analysisen_US
dc.subjectTensile strengthen_US
dc.subjectAluminum alloy compositesen_US
dc.subjectFractured surfacesen_US
dc.subjectHeat treated alloyen_US
dc.subjectInterface decohesionen_US
dc.subjectMechanical behavioren_US
dc.subjectParticle-matrix interfaceen_US
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopicen_US
dc.subjectUltimate tensile strengthen_US
dc.subjectFatigue of materialsen_US
dc.titleMechanical properties of Al-Si-SiC compositesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: