Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/8640
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPanda, Debashisen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmadabathuni, Anil Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:29:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:29:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPanda, D., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, E. A. (2018). A comparative study of CO2 capture by amine grafted vs amine impregnated zeolite 4A. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, , 377(1) doi:10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012148en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-8981-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85050477769)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012148-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/8640-
dc.description.abstractZeolite 4A was functionalized via grafting and impregnation techniques using 0.3 wt% of isopropylamine (IPA) and (3-aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (APTMS) respectively. Physicochemical properties of zeolite 4A containing binder were changed after amine loading, as both specific surface area and pore volume was decreased by 1.52 % 18.18 % and 28.06 % 90.90 % for Z4A-IPA (IPA impregnated zeolite 4A) and Z4A-APTMS (APTMS grafted zeolite 4A) respectively. The adsorbed CO2 amount of Z4A, Z4A-IPA, and Z4A-APTMS were 1.58 mmol g-1 (6.95 wt%), 2.31 mmol g-1 (10.16 wt%) and 1.05 mmol g-1 (4.62 wt%) respectively at 1 bar and 25 °C. Noticeably, among all the studied adsorbents, Z4A-IPA displayed the highest adsorption capacity of 1.39 mmol g-1 (6.11 wt%) at 0.15 bar, which is akin to the CO2 partial pressure of post-combustion flue gas. The multilayer tethering of the bulkier APTMS on the zeolite external surface resulted in the partial blockage of the pores and hence the facile access of CO2 inside the pores of zeolite was hindered. However, Z4A-APTMS was found to be more thermal stable than Z4A-IPA. Furthermore, we observed that physisorption was playing a vital role in CO2 adsorption for pristine zeolite 4A (Z4A), whereas, after amine incorporation, the presence of amine induced the heterogeneous interaction between CO2 and sorbents. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishingen_US
dc.sourceIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of CO2 capture by amine grafted vs amine impregnated zeolite 4Aen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.rights.licenseAll Open Access, Bronze-
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: