Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/8812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDas, Sandeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorBhauriyal, Preetien_US
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Biswarupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:29:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:29:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationDas, S., Bhauriyal, P., & Pathak, B. (2020). Theoretical insights into solid electrolyte interphase formation in an al anode dual-ion battery. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 124(14), 7634-7643. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11421en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-7447-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85084086703)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11421-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/8812-
dc.description.abstractDual-ion batteries (DIBs) are emerging as a highly attractive class of batteries as they try to address the shortcomings of the widely used lithium ion batteries. Among the various organic electrolytes used in DIBs, ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) with LiPF6 salt is recently being considered as a better electrolyte in comparison to commercially used ethylene carbonate (EC). In this work, we have carried out a comparative study of EMC and EC solvent systems to address the greater stability of EMC in contact with aluminum (Al) and lithiated Al (LiAl) electrode as well as the effect of salt in the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation process with the help of ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. We find that EMC can decompose via 1e- reduction due to limited charge transfer from the Al surface, whereas 2e- reduction becomes more favorable with lithiation of the Al anode surface. The limited decomposition observed in EMC compared to EC in contact with the Al electrode surface justifies the enhanced stability of EMC solvent in DIBs with an Al anode. However, the decomposition and SEI formation process can speed up in the presence of LiPF6 salt as it induces more charge transfer (1.11 |e| for Al and 2.86 |e| for LiAl) from the electrode surface. Nevertheless, the charge transfer is less than in the case of EC solvent (2.54 |e| for Al and 5.42 |e| for LiAl), further justifying the stability of EMC solvent. We also find that the charge transfer to the salt molecule from the electrode surface depends on the position of the salt rather than the composition of the electrode surface. Overall, our study shows that the EMC solvent-LiPF6 salt combination can serve as an efficient electrolyte for Al anode DIBs. © 2020 American Chemical Society.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Physical Chemistry Cen_US
dc.subjectAnodesen_US
dc.subjectBinary alloysen_US
dc.subjectCharge transferen_US
dc.subjectEthyleneen_US
dc.subjectIonsen_US
dc.subjectLithium-ion batteriesen_US
dc.subjectMolecular dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectSolid electrolytesen_US
dc.subjectSolid-State Batteriesen_US
dc.subjectSolventsen_US
dc.subjectAb initio molecular dynamics simulationen_US
dc.subjectComparative studiesen_US
dc.subjectElectrode surfacesen_US
dc.subjectEnhanced stabilityen_US
dc.subjectEthyl methyl carbonateen_US
dc.subjectEthylene carbonateen_US
dc.subjectOrganic electrolyteen_US
dc.subjectSolid electrolyte interphaseen_US
dc.subjectAluminumen_US
dc.titleTheoretical Insights into Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation in an Al Anode Dual-Ion Batteryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: