Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/9294
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChelvam, Venkateshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationPoh, S., Chelvam, V., & Low, P. S. (2015). Comparison of nanoparticle penetration into solid tumors and sites of inflammation: Studies using targeted and nontargeted liposomes. Nanomedicine, 10(9), 1439-1449. doi:10.2217/nnm.14.237en_US
dc.identifier.issn1743-5889-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-84929908998)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.14.237-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/9294-
dc.description.abstractAim: The vast majority of nanomedicine research is focused on the use of nanoparticles for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. However, the dense extracellular matrix of solid tumors restricts nanoparticle penetration, raising the question of whether the best applications of nanomedicines lie in oncology. Materials & methods: In this study, the uptake of folate-conjugated liposomes was compared between folate receptor-expressing tumors and folate receptor+ inflammatory lesions within the same mouse. Results: We demonstrate here that both folate-targeted and nontargeted liposomes accumulate more readily at sites of inflammation than in solid tumors. Conclusion: These data suggest that nanosized imaging and therapeutic agents may be better suited for the treatment and diagnosis of inflammatory/autoimmune diseases than cancer. © 2015 Future Medicine Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFuture Medicine Ltd.en_US
dc.sourceNanomedicineen_US
dc.subjectfolate receptoren_US
dc.subjectfolic aciden_US
dc.subjectliposomeen_US
dc.subjectnanoparticleen_US
dc.subjectfolic aciden_US
dc.subjectnanoparticleen_US
dc.subjectanimal cellen_US
dc.subjectanimal tissueen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectconjugationen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectliposomal deliveryen_US
dc.subjectmacrophageen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmouseen_US
dc.subjectmuscle injuryen_US
dc.subjectmyositisen_US
dc.subjectnonhumanen_US
dc.subjectphagocytosisen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectsolid tumoren_US
dc.subjectulcerative colitisen_US
dc.subjectanimalen_US
dc.subjectBagg albino mouseen_US
dc.subjectColitis, Ulcerativeen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectDBA mouseen_US
dc.subjectdrug delivery systemen_US
dc.subjectmetabolismen_US
dc.subjectneoplasmen_US
dc.subjecttissue distributionen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectColitis, Ulcerativeen_US
dc.subjectDrug Delivery Systemsen_US
dc.subjectFolic Aciden_US
dc.subjectLiposomesen_US
dc.subjectMiceen_US
dc.subjectMice, Inbred BALB Cen_US
dc.subjectMice, Inbred DBAen_US
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectTissue Distributionen_US
dc.titleComparison of nanoparticle penetration into solid tumors and sites of inflammation: Studies using targeted and nontargeted liposomesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.licenseAll Open Access, Green-
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: