Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/9331
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRai, R.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sanjay Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Biswarupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:32:22Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:32:22Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationMahata, A., Rai, R. K., Choudhuri, I., Singh, S. K., & Pathak, B. (2014). Direct vs. indirect pathway for nitrobenzene reduction reaction on a ni catalyst surface: A density functional study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 16(47), 26365-26374. doi:10.1039/c4cp04355cen_US
dc.identifier.issn1463-9076-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-84912101096)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp04355c-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/9331-
dc.description.abstractDensity functional theory (DFT) calculations are performed to understand and address the previous experimental results that showed the reduction of nitrobenzene to aniline prefers direct over indirect reaction pathways irrespective of the catalyst surface. Nitrobenzene to aniline conversion occurs via the hydroxyl amine intermediate (direct pathway) or via the azoxybenzene intermediate (indirect pathway). Through our computational study we calculated the spin polarized and dispersion corrected reaction energies and activation barriers corresponding to various reaction pathways for the reduction of nitrobenzene to aniline over a Ni catalyst surface. The adsorption behaviour of the substrate, nitrobenzene, on the catalyst surface was also considered and the energetically most preferable structural orientation was elucidated. Our study indicates that the parallel adsorption behaviour of the molecules over a catalyst surface is preferable over vertical adsorption behaviour. Based on the reaction energies and activation barrier of the various elementary steps involved in direct or indirect reaction pathways, we find that the direct reduction pathway of nitrobenzene over the Ni(111) catalyst surface is more favourable than the indirect reaction pathway. © the Owner Societies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourcePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physicsen_US
dc.subjectanilineen_US
dc.subjectaniline derivativeen_US
dc.subjectnickelen_US
dc.subjectnitrobenzeneen_US
dc.subjectnitrobenzene derivativeen_US
dc.subjectcatalysisen_US
dc.subjectchemical structureen_US
dc.subjectchemistryen_US
dc.subjectoxidation reduction reactionen_US
dc.subjectquantum theoryen_US
dc.subjectsurface propertyen_US
dc.subjectsynthesisen_US
dc.subjectAniline Compoundsen_US
dc.subjectCatalysisen_US
dc.subjectMolecular Structureen_US
dc.subjectNickelen_US
dc.subjectNitrobenzenesen_US
dc.subjectOxidation-Reductionen_US
dc.subjectQuantum Theoryen_US
dc.subjectSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.titleDirect vs. Indirect pathway for nitrobenzene reduction reaction on a Ni catalyst surface: A density functional studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: