Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/15403
Title: Towards 21-cm intensity mapping at z = 2.28 with uGMRT using the tapered gridded estimator I: Foreground avoidance
Authors: Datta, Abhirup
Choudhury, Madhurima
Keywords: diffuse radiation;large-scale structure of Universe;methods: data analysis;methods: statistical;techniques: interferometric
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: Pal, S., Elahi, K. M. A., Bharadwaj, S., Ali, S. S., Choudhuri, S., Ghosh, A., Chakraborty, A., Datta, A., Roy, N., Choudhury, M., & Dutta, P. (2022). Towards 21-cm intensity mapping at z = 2.28 with uGMRT using the tapered gridded estimator I: Foreground avoidance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 516(2), 2851–2863. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2419
Abstract: The post-reionization (z ≤ 6) neutral hydrogen (H i) 21-cm intensity mapping signal holds the potential to probe the large-scale structures, study the expansion history, and constrain various cosmological parameters. Here, we apply the Tapered Gridded Estimator (TGE) to estimate P(kaŠ, ka) the power spectrum of the $z = 2.28\, (432.8\, {\rm MHz})$ redshifted 21-cm signal using a $24.4\, {\rm MHz}$ sub-band drawn from uGMRT Band 3 observations of European Large-Area ISO Survey-North 1 (ELAIS-N1). The TGE allows us to taper the sky response, which suppresses the foreground contribution from sources in the periphery of the telescope's field of view. We apply the TGE on the measured visibility data to estimate the multifrequency angular power spectrum (MAPS) Cá"(Δν) from which we determine P(kaŠ, ka) using maximum likelihood that naturally overcomes the issue of missing frequency channels (55 per cent here). The entire methodology is validated using simulations. For the data, using the foreground avoidance technique, we obtain a upper limit of for the 21-cm brightness temperature fluctuation at. This corresponds to where respectively, denote the cosmic H i mass density and the H i bias parameter. A previous work has analysed of the same data at z = 2.19, and reported The upper limits presented here are still orders of magnitude larger than the expected signal corresponding to © 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2419
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/15403
ISSN: 0035-8711
Type of Material: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: