Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/16778
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ummeden_US
dc.contributor.authorRajak, Ashish Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-04T12:47:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-04T12:47:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationSingh, U., & Rajak, A. (2025). A comparative study on performance evaluation of Archimedean spiral and helical coils with step taper field shaper in magnetic pulse crimping of AA-1050 and CFRP using numerical and experimental approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054251352246en_US
dc.identifier.issn2041-2975-
dc.identifier.issn0954-4054-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-105012760497)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09544054251352246-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16778-
dc.description.abstractMagnetic Pulse Crimping (MPC) is an environmentally friendly and cold joining process. The MPC process uses a high-intensity pulsed magnetic field to induce the Lorentz force on a conductive flyer onto a stationary target workpiece, creating a mechanically interlocked joint. The combination of Aluminum alloy and CFRP has numerous applications due to their superior property, corrosion resistance, and strength-to-weight ratio. This manuscript presents a comparative study for MPC of the flyer AA-1050 tube and the target CFRP rod using a novel Archimedean spiral (AS) and a helical coil with a field shaper using numerical and experimental analysis. AA-1050 and CFRP were crimped at varying discharge energies. An analytical comparison of the primary coils was conducted to calculate the induced magnetic field. A numerical study was conducted to find current density, magnetic field distribution, Lorentz force, impact velocity, and other important parameters. The optimum mesh size has been identified using mesh convergence. Joint strength was evaluated through a pullout test, compression shear test, and cross-sectional analysis. The manuscript provides a comparative analysis of coil performance and explores MPC as an alternative joining method for AA-1050 and CFRP. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.sourceProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufactureen_US
dc.subjectAa-1050en_US
dc.subjectArchimedean Spiral Coilen_US
dc.subjectCfrpen_US
dc.subjectHelical Coilen_US
dc.subjectLs-dyna Em Moduleen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Pulse Crimping (mpc)en_US
dc.subjectAluminum Alloysen_US
dc.subjectCorrosion Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectJoiningen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Fieldsen_US
dc.subjectShear Flowen_US
dc.subjectAa-1050en_US
dc.subjectArchimedean Spiralen_US
dc.subjectArchimedean Spiral Coilen_US
dc.subjectComparatives Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHelical Coilen_US
dc.subjectLs-dynaen_US
dc.subjectLs-dyna Em Moduleen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Pulseen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Pulse Crimpingen_US
dc.subjectSpiral Coilsen_US
dc.subjectMesh Generationen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on performance evaluation of Archimedean spiral and helical coils with step taper field shaper in magnetic pulse crimping of AA-1050 and CFRP using numerical and experimental approachen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: