Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/3901
Title: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1
Authors: Sonavane, Avinash
Keywords: adenylate kinase;atg16l1 protein;autophagy related protein;autophagy related protein 14;autophagy related protein 18;autophagy related protein 5;autophagy related protein 8 family;beclin 1;biological marker;dfcp1 protein;DNA;gamma interferon;green fluorescent protein;mammalian target of rapamycin;nanoparticle;phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase;protein;RNA;sequestosome 1;serine threonine protein kinase ULK1;SNARE protein;sphingolipid;stx17 protein;tecpr1 protein;ubiquitin;unclassified drug;aggrephagy;apicoplast;assay;autophagosome;autophagy (cellular);bimolecular fluorescence complementation;Caenorhabditis elegans;cell death;cell nucleus;cell stress;cell vacuole;chlorophagy;chromatophagy;clockophagy;crinophagy;data base;doryphagy;Drosophila melanogaster;DT40 cell line;enzyme activity;erythroid cell;ferritinophagy;filamentous fungus;flow cytometry;fluorescence microscopy;food biotechnology;gene dosage;genomics;granulophagy;helminth;honeybee;human;Hydra;immunofluorescence assay;immunohistochemistry;induced pluripotent stem cell;Lepidoptera;lipophagocytosis;lysophagy;lysosome;macroautophagy;malignant neoplasm;marine invertebrate;mathematical model;microautophagy;mitophagy;myelinophagy;Neotropical teleosts;nerve degeneration;nonhuman;nucleophagocytosis;odontoblast;Oncorhynchus mykiss;oxiapoptophagy;pexography;plant;practice guideline;protein analysis;protein degradation;protein processing;proteomics;proteophagy;protist;reticulophagy;retinal pigment epithelium;Review;ribophagy;sea urchin;selective autophagy;tick;transcription regulation;transmission electron microscopy;Turbellaria;virophagy;Western blotting;xenophagy;yeast;zebra fish;zymophagy
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Citation: Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., . . . Tong, C. -. (2021). Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1. Autophagy, 17(1), 1-382. doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/3901
ISSN: 1554-8627
Type of Material: Review
Appears in Collections:Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: