Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6927
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKadiyam, Jagadeeshen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Santhakumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorDeshmukh, Devendraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:51:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:51:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationKadiyam, J., Mohan, S., Deshmukh, D., & Seo, T. (2021). Simulation-based semi-empirical comparative study of fixed and vectored thruster configurations for an underwater vehicle. Ocean Engineering, 234 doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109231en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85107142392)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109231-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6927-
dc.description.abstractIn the recent past, intervention-class autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have gained the ocean/marine research community's attention due to their multidisciplinary operational capabilities. This article discusses a detailed comparative-performance study of an underwater vehicle (UV) with two different actuator configurations based on fixed-thrusters and vectored thrusters. The fixed-thruster configuration consists of eight thrusters. Four thrusters generate thrust in the horizontal plane and the remaining thrusters produce thrust in heave direction. The vectored thruster configuration has four thrusters placed at diagonal corners of a rectangular vehicle, and four independent internal servomotors rotate these thrusters. The classification terminology in this article identifies the underwater vehicle without vectoring capability as Fixed-Thruster Underwater Vehicle (FTUV) and the one with vectoring capability as Vectored-Thruster Underwater Vehicle (VTUV). Furthermore, a nonlinear controller is designed, based on a backstepping scheme for tracking a given spatial profile in a three-dimensional space. An underwater robot's control for a trajectory tracking problem is useful for any real-time multidisciplinary autonomous applications. The comparative simulation results are summarized to validate both the vehicle variants’ performance differences. © 2021 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceOcean Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectAutonomous underwater vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectVehicle performanceen_US
dc.subjectAutonomous underwater vehicles]en_US
dc.subjectComparatives studiesen_US
dc.subjectFixed thrustersen_US
dc.subjectIntervention-class autonomous underwater vehicleen_US
dc.subjectOveractuated systemsen_US
dc.subjectRotatable/tilting/pivoted thrusteren_US
dc.subjectSemi-empiricalen_US
dc.subjectUnderwater vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectVectored thrustersen_US
dc.subjectVectored-thrusten_US
dc.subjectBacksteppingen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcomputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectempirical analysisen_US
dc.subjectunderwater vehicleen_US
dc.titleSimulation-based semi-empirical comparative study of fixed and vectored thruster configurations for an underwater vehicleen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: