Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6964
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKothari, Rohiten_US
dc.contributor.authorSahu, Santosh Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorKundalwal, Shaileshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:51:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:51:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationKothari, R., Sahu, S. K., Kundalwal, S. I., & Mahalkar, P. (2021). Thermal performance of phase change material–based heat sink for passive cooling of electronic components: An experimental study. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(4), 5939-5963. doi:10.1002/er.6215en_US
dc.identifier.issn0363-907X-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85096748081)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/er.6215-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/6964-
dc.description.abstractPresent paper reports the thermal performance of various phase change material (PCM)-based heat sinks during melting process for cooling of portable electronic devices through experimental investigations. Heat sink configurations include unfinned with pure PCM, finned with pure PCM, unfinned with metallic foam (MF)–PCM composite, and finned with MF–PCM composite. Paraffin wax is used as PCM, and tests have been carried out for various input heat flux values (1.3, 2.0, and 2.7 kW/m2) at different volume fractions of PCM (0, 0.50, 0.86, and 1). The effect of various parameters such as PCM volume fraction, heat sink type, and heat flux on the stretching of operating time to achieve a set point temperature (SPT) is studied. Results obtained from the current experimental investigation are compared with the existing test results. Also, unfinned heat sink without and with PCM is used for baseline comparison. The evolution and propagation of melt front inside the heat sink are studied through photographic observation. The enhancement in operating time is found to vary with the SPT and heat flux values. MF–PCM-based heat sinks are more advantageous for higher value of input heat flux (2.0 and 2.7 kW/m2). For q″ = 1.3 and 2.0 kW/m2, four-finned MF–PCM-based heat sink exhibits better performance; while three-finned MF–PCM-based heat sink shows best performance at q″ = 2.7 kW/m2. The highest enhancement ratio of ~2.97 is obtained at 1.3 and 2.7 kW/m2 for four-finned MF–PCM heat sink and three-finned MF–PCM heat sink, respectively. Also, three-finned heat sink provides higher heat transfer rate and highest thermal conductance at q″ = 2.7 kW/m2. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltden_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Energy Researchen_US
dc.subjectElectronic coolingen_US
dc.subjectFoamsen_US
dc.subjectHeat sinksen_US
dc.subjectNetwork componentsen_US
dc.subjectPhase change materialsen_US
dc.subjectVolume fractionen_US
dc.subjectEnhancement ratiosen_US
dc.subjectExperimental investigationsen_US
dc.subjectHeat transfer rateen_US
dc.subjectPhotographic observationen_US
dc.subjectPortable electronic devicesen_US
dc.subjectSet-point temperaturesen_US
dc.subjectThermal conductanceen_US
dc.subjectThermal Performanceen_US
dc.subjectHeat fluxen_US
dc.titleThermal performance of phase change material–based heat sink for passive cooling of electronic components: An experimental studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: