Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Santhakumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:53:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:53:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSingh, Y., & Santhakumar, M. (2016). Performance investigations on optimum mechanical design aspects of planar parallel manipulators. Advanced Robotics, 30(10), 652-675. doi:10.1080/01691864.2016.1144523en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-1864-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-84959061225)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2016.1144523-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7267-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative analysis of three degrees of freedom planar parallel robotic manipulators (x, y and θz motion platforms) namely 2PRP-PPR, 2PRR-PPR, 3PPR (Hybrid), 3PRP (Hephaist) and 3PPR U-base in terms of optimal kinematic design performance, static structural stiffness and dynamic performance (energy and power consumption). Kinematic and dynamic performance analyses of these platforms have been done using multibody dynamics software (namely ADAMS/View). Static stiffness of the above-mentioned manipulators have been analysed, compared using the conventional joint space Jacobian stiffness matrix method, and this method has been verified through a standard finite-element software (namely NASTRAN) as well. The size of the fixed base or aspect ratio (width/height) can be varied for various working conditions to understand its design parameters and optimal design aspects which are depending on the fixed base structure. Different aspect ratios (fixed base size) are considered for the comparative analyses of isotropy, manipulability and stiffness for the above-mentioned planar parallel manipulators. From the numerical simulation results, it is observed that the 2PRP-PPR manipulator is associated with a few favourable optimum design aspects such as singularity-free workspace, better manipulability, isotropy, higher stiffness and better dynamic performance in terms of power and energy requirement as compared to other planar parallel manipulators. © 2016 Taylor & Francis and The Robotics Society of Japan.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRobotics Society of Japanen_US
dc.sourceAdvanced Roboticsen_US
dc.subjectAspect ratioen_US
dc.subjectDegrees of freedom (mechanics)en_US
dc.subjectDynamic analysisen_US
dc.subjectFlexible manipulatorsen_US
dc.subjectKinematicsen_US
dc.subjectMechanismsen_US
dc.subjectRobot programmingen_US
dc.subjectStiffnessen_US
dc.subjectStiffness matrixen_US
dc.subjectisotropyen_US
dc.subjectKinematic Analysisen_US
dc.subjectManipulabilityen_US
dc.subjectOptimum designsen_US
dc.subjectPlanar parallel manipulatorsen_US
dc.subjectFinite element methoden_US
dc.titlePerformance investigations on optimum mechanical design aspects of planar parallel manipulatorsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: