Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7284
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jain, Neelesh Kumar | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-21T10:53:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T01:00:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-21T10:53:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Shandilya, P., Jain, P. K., & Jain, N. K. (2016). Modelling and process optimisation for wire electric discharge machining of metal matrix composites. International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 18(4), 377-391. doi:10.1504/IJMMM.2016.077713 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-5711 | - |
dc.identifier.other | EID(2-s2.0-84979519979) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMM.2016.077713 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7284 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper describes the process modelling and optimisation of wire electric discharge machining (WEDM) of SiCp/6061 Al metal matrix composite (MMC) through response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) approach. The experiments were planned and carried out based on the design of experiments (DOE). Four WEDM input process parameters namely servo voltage (SV), pulse-on time (TON), pulse-off time (TOFF) and wire feed rate (WF) were chosen as machining process parameters. Two response criteria [i.e., material removal rate (MRR) and cutting width (kerf)] were selected during optimisation. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to study the effect of process parameters on response variables and models have also been developed for response parameters. RSM was used to determine the optimal values of input process parameters maximum MRR and minimum kerf. The output of the RSM model was used to develop the ANN predictive model. ANN model was validated through experimentation conducted at the RSM optimal setting of input parameters and results show that ANN predictive model and the actual experimental observations are very close to each other which give a good agreement between the two. Comparisons of ANN models and RSM models show that ANN predictions are more accurate than RSM predictions. © 2016 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Inderscience Publishers | en_US |
dc.source | International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials | en_US |
dc.subject | Analysis of variance (ANOVA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Design of experiments | en_US |
dc.subject | Electric discharge machining | en_US |
dc.subject | Electric discharges | en_US |
dc.subject | Neural networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictive analytics | en_US |
dc.subject | Surface properties | en_US |
dc.subject | Wire | en_US |
dc.subject | Al metal matrix composites | en_US |
dc.subject | Machining process parameters | en_US |
dc.subject | Material removal rate | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictive modeling | en_US |
dc.subject | Process optimisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Response surface methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | WEDM | en_US |
dc.subject | Wire electric discharge machining | en_US |
dc.subject | Metallic matrix composites | en_US |
dc.title | Modelling and process optimisation for wire electric discharge machining of metal matrix composites | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Mechanical Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Altmetric Badge: