Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7284
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJain, Neelesh Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:53:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T01:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:53:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationShandilya, P., Jain, P. K., & Jain, N. K. (2016). Modelling and process optimisation for wire electric discharge machining of metal matrix composites. International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 18(4), 377-391. doi:10.1504/IJMMM.2016.077713en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-5711-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-84979519979)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMM.2016.077713-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.iiti.ac.in/handle/123456789/7284-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the process modelling and optimisation of wire electric discharge machining (WEDM) of SiCp/6061 Al metal matrix composite (MMC) through response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) approach. The experiments were planned and carried out based on the design of experiments (DOE). Four WEDM input process parameters namely servo voltage (SV), pulse-on time (TON), pulse-off time (TOFF) and wire feed rate (WF) were chosen as machining process parameters. Two response criteria [i.e., material removal rate (MRR) and cutting width (kerf)] were selected during optimisation. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to study the effect of process parameters on response variables and models have also been developed for response parameters. RSM was used to determine the optimal values of input process parameters maximum MRR and minimum kerf. The output of the RSM model was used to develop the ANN predictive model. ANN model was validated through experimentation conducted at the RSM optimal setting of input parameters and results show that ANN predictive model and the actual experimental observations are very close to each other which give a good agreement between the two. Comparisons of ANN models and RSM models show that ANN predictions are more accurate than RSM predictions. © 2016 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInderscience Publishersen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materialsen_US
dc.subjectAnalysis of variance (ANOVA)en_US
dc.subjectDesign of experimentsen_US
dc.subjectElectric discharge machiningen_US
dc.subjectElectric dischargesen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectPredictive analyticsen_US
dc.subjectSurface propertiesen_US
dc.subjectWireen_US
dc.subjectAl metal matrix compositesen_US
dc.subjectMachining process parametersen_US
dc.subjectMaterial removal rateen_US
dc.subjectPredictive modelingen_US
dc.subjectProcess optimisationen_US
dc.subjectResponse surface methodologyen_US
dc.subjectWEDMen_US
dc.subjectWire electric discharge machiningen_US
dc.subjectMetallic matrix compositesen_US
dc.titleModelling and process optimisation for wire electric discharge machining of metal matrix compositesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: